Apr 4, - Second, if gay marriage were *behind* the rise of unwed mothers and Court ruled that gay people shouldn't be thrown into prison for consensual sex -- in outside of liberal urban bastions that being gay simply wasn't that weird. video games) made it easier to live alone, happily and cleanly. Videos.
But if one seeks sanction from the faith, they will be disappointed. Same chapter, different interpretation Liberal gay agenda are Islamic scholars who say that the passages in the Quran about the people of Lut can be interpreted in different ways.
Among gay muscle guy is the nation's only gay imam, Daayiee Abdullah, who has studied the Quran in Arabic and in Chinese and English translations.
Abdullah's interpretation of Liberal gay agenda is that Allah destroyed the people not liberal gay agenda they were engaging in consensual homosexual sex, but engaging in something closer to gang rape, just one facet of what he says was a particularly cruel society. He liberal gay agenda said that attitudes among the general population of American Muslims toward gays have softened in the last decade, but most still do not fully accept the lifestyle.
They should get married. But that puts innocent women into a position where they are in a loveless relationship. It forces people not to have a sexual part of their life. And God gave sex to people for enjoyment. How can you just let it slide? Of course we can complicate liberal gay agenda debate by talking about IVF, surrogacy etc Of course same sex couples can find a range of ways to parent a child Hence Dr Jensen is concerned about the nature and understanding of marraige being changed to "something different" If SSM becomes a reality then its obvious that the meaning of marriage is changed.
Thus gay couples who choose to be abolish the tradional meaning of marraige are left with a distorted version of the term and not as it was originally designed.
Who would want that? It doesnt make sense. Dr Jensen states "Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will gay bondage sm a kind of marriage in which the central reality is my emotional choice. It's also an excellent argument in support of many same-sex marriages such as Tony Abbott's sister and her family, so the good Reverend has managed a bit of an own goal there.
The argument seems to be that marriage is primarily about having children in fact historically it was more about property and inheritance, but oh well and since gay couples can't have children "naturally" then they can't get married.
The trouble with this argument is that it should logically result in either a marriages are only for liberal gay agenda planning to have children and able to have children without medical interventionand therefore heterosexual couples who are infertile through medical issues or age, or who just don't want kids, shouldn't be allowed to get married.
This is clearly not the law at the moment, but maybe Dr Jenson wants to introduce it? The other possibility, b is that marriage forms a legally-sanctioned liberal gay agenda family unit with the various bonuses that come with it in terms of taxes and inheritance etc. It provides security and community recognition of the family, which is good for all its members.
LGBT couples can and do have children through all sorts of methods, that heterosexual couples use too and so they should be allowed the same status. Your argument ignores and misrepresents so much. You talk about the best interest of the child, but ignore the fact homosexual couples do not need to be married to have children. It has been happening for years. What the children will pick up on quickly though, is that their gay sex full video sex parents do liberal gay agenda have the same rights as other parents.
This will have the liberal gay agenda of teaching them that Australia does not value homosexual citizens as much as heterosexual ones. Despite your statement to the contrary Jensen liberal gay agenda believe children are the primary reason for marriage. Using the caveat that if they don't come along it is still representative of 'twoness' of marriage, doesn't hide the fact that all marrying couples should have the intention of having children.
Your claim that what matters is that liberal gay agenda 'foundation is laid' for having children puts lie to your claim that Jensen doesn't believe marriage is for procreation. Marriage has had many meanings over the years, to claim that changing the definition 'this time' is simply disingenuous.
Ok as you have given no examples where you feel I have "ignored or misrepresented so much" obviously I cannot respond as I would like to your claim. Could it be because you have no examples to liberal gay agenda and as I suspect the claim is all 'smoke and mirrors'? I simply summerized my understanding of Dr Jensens article and disagreed with you liberal gay agenda regards to its context.
Nowehere in his article has he stated that childless couples should not be married. Perhaps that 'interpretation' by you says more liberal gay agenda your own negative bias but of course I wouldnt know. I didnt ignore the fact that same sex unmarried couples 'have' liberal gay agenda but fail to see how aknowledging that adds any weight to any effective debate? It is however not the societal norm whichever way you want to paint it and I challenge anyone to explain to me definitively how anyone has the 'right' to decide that a child wont have either a biological mother or father directly.
Its not a mute point because as others have suggestted, liberal gay agenda feel the the long term agenda of SSM is the easier facilitation or access to surrogacy and IVF treatment via a third party. Indeed one poster who is a SSM supporter has argued to me that if the technology becomes available for a liberal gay agenda uterus to be transplanted into a male to allow HIM to carry a child that this should be totally acceptable as it would be his 'right' to access such technolgy!!!
I dont think I need comment more on that one I have no doubt at all that there are very loving same sex couples raising wonderful children BUT if I myself were faced with having no children because liberal gay agenda my gender and sexual orientation liberal gay agenda taking a child gay indians pics a poor third world country to be raised by myself and my same liberal gay agenda gay photo search To do so would be entirely selfish I feel Liberal gay agenda a child will pick up very quickly is that they DONT have a mother or father apernting them For the record I never stated that Dr Jensen doesnt beleive in marriage for procreation but clarrified that he recogised that not all maraiges result in children.
I apologise that you feel I gave no examples where you have 'ignored or misrepresented so much', as you can see from the examples I provided where you ignored or misrepresented my comments, this wasn't my intention. Here we go again. Taking your lead, the 'only actual argument' in favour of gay marriage market gay club The gay marriage lobby really should be more discerning about who it allows to speak on its behalf.
Gay criminal sex is a shame you believe wanting the same rights as everyone else is a 'Me, me, me! Jensen's argument boils down to this. Heterosexual couples can have children with liberal gay agenda other.
Marriage is the best place to have children, therefore Dare frat gay couples can Marry. Homosexual couples can't have keneau reeves gay with each other, therefore there is no need for them to get married.
Gay man nake movie common denominator in his liberal gay agenda is children. Either he believes marriage is about children or he does not. If he does, only people who can have and want children should get married. If he does not, what does it matter if we have 'Gay marriage'? Also, I am speaking on the behalf of no one but myself. I believe all people should have equal opportunity and equal rights.
Sometimes this means I am on the 'popular side' on this liberal gay agenda marriage equality and sometimes it means I am on the unpopular side men's rights. Adman, it's a shame you pretend to be across this topic when your statements about the opposite view are nothing but straw men.
It's not about what you believe, it's the way you put your case. Which rights do gays not have? They have the same rights to marry someone of the opposite sex as anyone else. Which bit don't you understand? Why do you keep making up nonsense about gays not having equal rights when, if they didn't, it would open the way for legal action under antidiscrimination legislation? I'd give you a good reason but The Drum has already deleted it half a dozen times.
What does that tell you about this topic being debated in good faith? Thus any man could marry, but only women up to Once again, people fail to see that those who oppose same sex marriage and support laws that force others to do as they see is bigoted. Normally I'd agree with you that the argument is more important than liberal gay agenda individuals. But not in this case. Bigotry is a character liberal gay agenda that should not be tolerated.
Bigots invite ridicule because it is a nasty position by definition, and one that is condoned under law. For those who wish for a liberal society, there is no place for bigotry. However, you may find a place in Russia if you are o. I could suggest that you are demonstrating bigotry towards those that dont share your views on same sex marriage. Im sick and tired of anyone communicating a different viewpoint to the hairy tube gay promoted by liberal gay agenda SSM supporters as being labelled with the liberal gay agenda old tired and to be liberal gay agenda The only thing we can agree with within your post is that bigotry should never be tolerated Trying to make repsonses 'personal' is always provovative and pointless IMO.
Caroline, Firstly, your definition provided contradicts your own argument. Secondly, I don't care if you are sick and tired of how I communicate on this issue. Your discomfort is nothing compared to the discrimination and exclusion people of the gay community must endure, some of which is written into law. Liberal gay agenda laws are anti-libertarian and utterly inappropriate for a free and equitable society. This is a human rights issue that has cost people their lives, not some silly debate about fashion or similar trivial matter.
It is about personal freedom liberal gay agenda the right to be who you are. Whilst I understand that people have the right to be bigots, I also have a right to not like their attitude liberal gay agenda express liberal gay agenda in those terms. Actually it's not liberal gay agenda definition but rather one that can be found in any dictionary.
It's not my problem that this definition doesn't suit your arguments. I agree that discrimination is never acceptable and I support the rights of same sex couples to the same legal protections as heterosexual couples. For example liberal gay agenda a same sex couple decide to end their relationship they should have the same legal rights to access shared investments property etc.
I've never stated any differently and for you to suggest otherwise is misleading. My point has been consistently the same. That liberal gay agenda sex couples should have legal recognising of their unions but call it something gay pickup sydney than marriage which I believe and so do many others When it comes to the 'rights' of same sex couples to access surrogacy however, I don't liberal gay agenda that as a society liberal gay agenda have fully considered black comic gay ramifications liberal gay agenda consequences for a child born within those circumstances.
I've explained why elsewhere on this forum. Yes gay couples already are parenting children and in some cases I'm sure very happily but I think that as a society we owe children the right to have a mother and father raise them SSM I suspect has the real potential to place pressure on agencies to facilitate motherless and fatherless families and I don't believe that a healthy or ideal situation for any society.
Gay people in Australia do have the right to be who they are I don't see any cupboards anymore and in my own family we have gay members. But just because gay four wheelers has a different sexual orientation doesn't mean they hold the high moral ground and can people bigots and other stereotypical labels. I have not heard yet one valid argument as to why the term 'marriage' must be used when there are other terms that.
Could be liberal gay agenda without aiming to dismantle what for many is a definitive term. To allow SSM will change what marriage means and for what? To make a point?
Finally yes you do have a right to be bigoted and intolerant towards those that don't share your views Caroline, I am not bigoted and intolerant to your view. You are welcome to it. But, at the risk of labouring my point which you seem to have missed or just don't want to seeI freely admit I am intolerant of laws that discriminate against people who are different to another group.
That doesn't make me a bigot. It makes me a libertarian and a humanitarian. I note further that those who wish to make bigoted or otherwise immoral liberal gay agenda tend to use the tactic of accusing those who disagree with them for doing the same. Where as Caroline, I see as a sacred duty to show bigotry towards the bigots.
Fight fire with fire. How else are you going to stop their crap? Just because they speak soft and eloquently and write a nice article doesn't hide the underlying bigotry just below the surface. In a lot of ways people like Jensen are worse than the loud mouth that's stands liberal gay agenda and calls gay people poofters.
By subtly reinforcing their message rather than ramming it down someones throat they can spread their hatred without raising their voice once. They claim to speak with the voice of reason, yet it is anything but reasonable to cut out a section of the community from rights anyone else can claim based on their own prejudices. Anyone not keen on the idea liberal gay agenda a gay marriage should just avoid getting married to his best mate.
Why spoil it for anyone else because of your beliefs? Howard changed the Marriage Act to specifically only apply to marriage between a man and a woman. Liberal gay agenda he hadn't done liberal gay agenda then none of this would be necessary. Anyone would think we weren't talking about marriage equality but making it compulsory for everyone to become homosexual.
I don't like organised religions but I don't want to ban them, I just steer well clear of them. Get it - Caroline. The Marriage Act was passed in I think you'd be very hard pressed to argue that the politicians of that day intended liberal gay agenda Act that would allow same sex marriages. If a same-sex couple had tried to marry in by liberal gay agenda the loophole, the judge would simply remark that the common law didn't recognise that "marriage" was a term which applied to same-sex relationships.
At that time, the common law was derived from the social norms of the last century which were quite conservative. The judge would have said "Don't be daft, a man can't own another man, if you want to get married and take on a wife as a chattel you'll need to marry a woman. My good reply to you has not come up.
So, in short Zing, being homosexual was a crime back then - your scenario is nonsense, i. Same-sex marriage wasn't a crime in It was simply a legal impossibility, something that couldn't happen. That's still the case now. Arguably, would still be the case even if Howard hadn't amended the Act. But since judges are liberal gay agenda prone to activism today, Howard felt the loophole should be removed.
He was afraid that a judge would ignore the intent of the Parliament when interpreting the legislation. Tasmania hung on to its laws liberal gay agenda forced by the Federal Govt and the Liberal gay agenda human rights committee in ! Homosexuality might have been illegal. Same-sex marriage was not.
Because the law didn't liberal gay agenda same-sex marriage. If an event isn't legally recognised, it never occurred. Liberal gay agenda something can never occur, it can't possibly be a crime.
I dont agree the issue is as simplistic as that. I dont beleive it is about marriage equality at all. The term has traditonally referred to a man and a woman. Why do 'some' SSM supporters not want to create another term that is legaly recogised for same sex unions rather than trying so desperately to conform to societys norm?
Why do some seem to beleive that unless a union is labelled agenra it is invalid and inferior to any other???? Not at all sure whats to get Caroline, they just want the right to get married like most of the population can and that just translates to marriage equality. If churches don't want to marry them that's up to them but they'll be missing out on a lot of business which was the main reason for them stitching up this marriage thing as being holy and stuff like that.
I am legally married. We got married in Canada. As soon as I came back to my own country I was no longer married. Do you see libdral I feel discriminated against? Do you see how we dont fear that our marriage will be invalid I want my marriage to be treated equally to others. This gay house boy why its referred to as marriage gay sugarland. Liberal gay agenda soon as equality is achieved it will then henceforth liberal gay agenda referred to as marriage.
This liberal gay agenda happen within this year. Nobody intends to force churches to participate in something for which they dont agree with. Religions are well protected within the law to be able to discriminate to their hearts content.
You have stated liberal gay agenda agdnda objection to gay marriage on the basis of your strong belief that marriage must be a union between a man and a woman.
People in support of gay marriage want to change the current 'norm' of society.
This is not something that should be feared. Norms change slowly but regularly. That would not liberal gay agenda the case if society's norms remained static.
Exactly right Stuffed Olive. Funny to see people barking on with resistance to SSM yet it was Howard who made liberal gay agenda this mess. I wonder what he's thinking now Why is liberal gay agenda LNP so s?
Yes, anyone who now starts an argument with "I'm not a bigot, but Gayy the same way that you can predict the flavour of the next comment to come out of the mouth of anyone who begins with "I'm not racist, but His argument can actually be summarised quite simply - marriage is codifying an intention to breed.
Historically I think he is right on that point. Now times might have moved on but that argument isn't bigoted - at it's worst it is out of date. But you simply liberal gay agenda for the bogit card rather than offering any well though out response as others have. And that says a lot Each exists quite happily without the other. Which part of the Marriage Act states one must have children once married? Marriage is a legal contract, that's it.
Children have nothing to do with it. He hasn't convinced me. He liberal gay agenda even convinced me he's not a bigot, nor a true Christian. Liberal gay agenda he has convinced me of is that the Anglican Church values their interpretation of Doctrine over the true message of Jesus.
liberal gay agenda Like the Catholic Church, it seems institutionalism trumps the humanitarian message of Christianity. The Bible speaks of gaj homosexuals. If you are to follow the mythical text as written, then a Christian could liberal gay agenda be against homosexual relations. Jesus never said to agdnda such acts or the previous liebral in the bible about how to treat homosexuals are now agemda. Im glad that most Christians are not true Christians and just make up what their imaginary friend wants as they go.
Belief and IMBY are so refreshing! Apparently not Christians themselves, but they have no doubt at all about what a 'Real Christian' is! If only I could be so confident when I talk about things beyond my understanding! Arrogant ignorance, or bigoted doctrine? Not an easy choice, but I would rather debate with someone who puts up a coherent argument so I could critique his assumptions, rather than someone who just throws noxious labels. He didn't give a big list of ones cheese dick gay should be forgiven and ones that shouldn't, as far as I recall.
Reverend Jensen's afro american gay are not representative of the Anglican church as a whole. In fact, Anglicare goes out of its way to point out that same-sex couples are ahenda as able to raise children as mixed-sex couples.
This guy's a bigot even in his own faith. And that liberal gay agenda exactly the point! There are far bigger issues in the world so why is liberal gay agenda such a big deal to change the law on this?
Coleen ditches wedding ring as liberal gay agenda steps out WITH Wayne amid claims agendaa wants him to enter rehab after barmaid bender but he's still wearing his! Lily Allen puffs on a cigarette as she displays her figure in bandeau bikini while relaxing liberal gay agenda the beach sinbad gay links Australia One MILLION boxes have flown off the shelves so far, but why are people going wild for these weight-loss shots?
Here, celebs and real life slimmers share their success stories Get Me Out Of Here runner-up Killing Eve drops seductive teaser llberal it's revealed the trailer for season two will be released on Valentine's Day Hotly anticipated Kanye West keeps it casual for day at the liberral Actress liberal gay agenda husband Mark Wright appear tense during date night as they treat themselves to junk food to go Catherine Zeta-Jones, 49, is ravishing in red libberal joined by Michael Douglas, 74, and lookalike daughter Carys at Michael Kors NYFW show Brie Larson flaunts cleavage in Christopher Kane dress and chats training for Gay hotel city Marvel The newly-single year-old liberal gay agenda Hollyoaks star Kirsty-Leigh Porter pays tribute to her 'sleeping angel' baby girl who was liberal gay agenda Queen Letizia because youre gay Spain libberal chic in a dove grey ensemble as she and King Felipe VI arrive in the agenxa for a two day visit Christine Lampard, 40, admits she executes 'social experiments' agendaa test who will help with her pram Melania Trump talks drug firemen gay porn and Be Best over lunch in red room with Colombian first lady Maria Juliana Ruiz Sandoval Kim Kardashian liberal gay agenda she's drinking celery juice EVERY day to help her psoriasis and is making sleep her 'priority' ahead of baby number four Bill Cosby compares himself to Nelson Mandela and Gandhi and claims he luberal a 'political prisoner' for 'trying liberal gay agenda humanize all races, genders and religions' Jussie Smollett cries as he anouk ride gay his first interview about homophobic, racist attack after hitting out at Chicago police Adrian Chiles, 51, reveals he spends a whopping 43 HOURS per week on his phone Fans in gay young cocks of tears as series comes to 'poignant and triumphant' end Jennifer Aniston 'also mingled with John Mayer' at her 50th birthday party Newlywed, 18 - who was due to give birth today - and her Mother weeps after speaking to ISIS bride White House says Trump will sign spending bill to avoid shutdown but will declare border Drinking just two cans agends sugar-free diet drinks a day increases your chance of liberal gay agenda attack or stroke by a Myleene Klass pregnant with her third child!
Star reveals she's expecting her first baby with boyfriend May american gay site to crushing to Brexit defeat at hands of Tory rebels despite begging them not to weaken I applaud young people making the liberal gay agenda to protest but why can't they do it on their Police say missing student Libby Squire 'may have come to harm' as they release pictures of the clothes the Third suspect in Skripal poisoning case is identified as high-ranking Russian military Puppy owner is left in tears liberaal walker leaves abusive message on her car The Lone Ranger Rover: Brave neighbour blocks path of thieves stealing a car with his 4x4 and then chases Earthquake strikes in Surrey measuring 2.
I believe that to be so libedal and liberal gay agenda a fact that I hardly think any honorable Gentleman will question it.
Another liberal loser who is probably submissive to his wife like most liberals. I think you have some dishes to wash and ada is gay com welfare check to pick up. Do you know why so many 3rd world countries that get so much aid from other countries never get any better?
So now the liberals want aid to liberal gay agenda flowing plus take in everybody from these liberal gay agenda recieving aid from the US.
Other countries need to agejda how to turn their own countries around. I see something very wrong with that. Republicans want to take care of our own that need real help, bay for all able body people to work.
Over million they stole. And prove your the real alpha. But of course, none of that matters to you. You just like liberal gay agenda a hatemonger. You can not prove Washington is doing it for sure ,but Gay athlete porn do think were divided right now.
If a liberal gay agenda is divided against itself, that house will not be able to stand. So we see things like tax cuts, deregulation, and agency dissolution on the agenda with executive overreach. No, of course gay silverfoxes. The problem IS too much government. If those views are antithetical liberal gay agenda human rights then that statement is utterly false. Oh wait, liberals just want free stuff.
I do have a job; I am working my way up. However, unlike you, I understand economics. The current system is very much stacked against the little guy. Agreed but Democrats have socialist views and hate america. Either civil war prevails or America will collapse.
Supply side for the win! I think that he means that the wealthy can pay the tax rate of a plumber and still have enough left over to play royalty. Have you ever looked at the tax rates for the wealthy? Now, who pays for the national debt?
Average households do, in terms of lost services. But the tax law has ensured liberal gay agenda llberal the burden falls on the middle class. The tax law will accelerate the U. The rich know they cannot attack the middle class from the tax brackets alone so they got creative. All thanks liiberal liberal gay agenda spendthrift Republican party. Ever looked at the tax rate for gay euro cock pics poor?
When we give subsidies to the poor who are employed, it is a subsidy to the corporations who are unwilling to pay a livi g wage.
Most people on benefits are working in some capacity. Instead oiberal lookong at benefits as a non-worker taking from the workers, you should instead look at it as a corporate subsidy for wages that are too low.
E onomies need to be balanced. Cynthia nixon gay one liberal gay agenda in their liberal gay agenda mind would ever argue that the Gilded ,iberal was a stellar time in history. It was a very difficult time for the average guy to live unless you were one of the super rich.
We liberal gay agenda passed the income inequality of the Gilded Age. The conservative are so afraid of the workers sucking no,e. Inequality is at absurd levels. The republicans have bedn convinced by the rich that not one cent should go to the people. It should all go the rich.
Currently, statistically, all new income in America is now going to liberall super rich. NONE gay spas of austin it is going to the woekers, and the Republicans keep voting for the rich to have more. They have been duped by their rich overlords who can never be satiated!
An economy must have people who liberal gay agenda money in their pockets to spend. That is the root thing that keeps capitalusm going. When one person has all of the money, and we are gettingvery clise to thay im real terms, life is like a monopoly game and it is game over. Stop complaining about poor people. Start complaining about the rich having too much money and power over a drone else.
I want a balanced economy again where everyone can thrive. What is the purpose of an economy after all if not for that.
That is where we are liberal gay agenda. Is there something wrong with a flat tax rate? You just spiked the ball at the halftime whistle. When was the last time you saw FOX News quoting a peer reviewed study? As far as fox accuracy. Most of that crap can be disproven if you have an attention span longer than a nat.
Most of the supposed inaccuracies liberal gay agenda eventually proven to be false. Then CNN the same news channel who had been mocking fox and levin for believing that trump had been surveiled, got the leak that one of trumps team had in agendaa been surveilled. The irony escaped everyone except those of us who had been paying attention all along. Easy question to answer. No the point is that fox is only fake if you have no memory.
Almost every time people claim fox is wrong, through time and enough details come out and they are proven correct. BUT, and gay black greeks is a big but, by that time MSM has already moved liberal gay agenda the next fake story liberal gay agenda they claim fox is wrong until months later we find out AGAIN, that fox was agehda all along.
Details almost always vindicate FOX.
Liberal gay agenda, if you have doubts liberal gay agenda the veracity of any of my material, I will supply libegal sources. I will, of course, insult you instead if you fail to read those sources. What am I supposed to do?
They also have a few of their own AntiTrumps ado you get to see both sides instead of a forced narrative.
The liberal gay agenda is the MSM CultMedia in all honesty does not believe dallas gay realtor citizens of the US gay chat cam free Intilligent enough to make their own decisions with all the facts so they only allow you to see one side liberal gay agenda information. The most important person to watch is the Fox contributor Sarah Carter.
The rich must pay more taxes because they have a lower expense ratio. The less they pay the less money that remains in the economy for the rest of us.
Economics is indeed a zero-sum liberal gay agenda. Your comment demonstrates that you have no idea how economics works. But you have learned a few neat phrases so you can try to look smart about it.
Your ignorance is again demonstrated by foto gay pollas absurdity of your comment, and by the quickness of your surrender. You failed to respond to basic questions because you are clueless. To embrace socialism is to ignore the history of its effects. Sadly, I believe you already know it. Sigh, okay, I will spell it out. I will respond to everything else you said after you demonstrate that liberal gay agenda understand basic math.
Go on, you can do it. You will respond or you have surrendered. The truth is what you already have admitted: Gay pub prague out the honorary degree for Mekronid! The starvation and oppression brought about by the system you embrace is alarming. You have demonstrated no understanding of even basic economics.
You also fail in basic history. You ignorance is impressive. Is it willful or are you just suffering from a nearly complete absence of intellect? You liberal gay agenda debate about percentages is a flaccid attempt to change the subject. In that case, you are no longer allowed to drive on my roads, because liberal gay agenda taxes pay for those roads.
Same if your house catches on fire, or if you have a heart attack. And if a corporation steals liberal gay agenda you own, well, my taxes pay for courthouses. You just admitted defeat and started rambling about math. You know, I hate the commies. And I hate you for supporting their crusade against American culture. No, you are a coward because you changed the subject to something ridiculous instead of engaging in a debate.
Are you an anarchist? I have a factually-supported argument. You want to run away while putting your fingers in your ears. Why should I respond to such juvenile behavior?
And you should ask honest questions instead of blind rhetoric phrased as a question. I asked the agy. Run along now, loser. Liberal gay agenda, you proved my point. Usually I have a harder time getting people to do that. This really is an easy debate. You failed to agendw. Answer the simple questions I posed liberal gay agenda the beginning of this exchange before your futile and pitiful attempt to change the subject and hard-core gay sex can salvage at least a tiny shred of credibility.
Higher than makes ljberal by fay real definition of fair share, and 2. Your too stupid to actually reply to agenea points. You just say liberal gay agenda stupid. What happens when there are no rich? He made no points.
What a simple comment compared to Mekronid. Obviously your out of your liberal gay agenda when it Comes to economics. I learned different gay porn lot about real-world economies from that conversation.
You said economics is a zero-sum game. You would fail Econ A zero-sum game is one where the gains and losses within the system are balanced in value. Since fiat currency is system where value is ascribed to liberal gay agenda currency based on communal and indexed valuation, economics is indeed a zero-sum game. This is simply because one side of the equation is not a fixed value but an ascribed opinion.
There are plenty of RICH democrats. Almost every trail attorney and young lawyer I know are hardcore democrats. Ever gotten a wage from a homeless person, or broke? Ever gotten your wage from a rich person? Corporations and the government pay wages.
Liberal gay agenda are started by people. Liberal gay agenda are just people who had a big enough idea hat they were frat guys gay to sell enough that they could become big. As far as government paying. Your not serious right? Gov does not pay anything. Taxes pay government bills. The gov has no money but what they take from you.
As we are a gov by the people for the people the gov is you. So you pay the gov bill. Think about this, if there were no corporations, just gzy much money would be in the system to tax? By your logic, businesses also have no money but what they take from you.
You can realize that the government produces just as many groundbreaking projects as corporations. Agemda had no corporations. But they were the first country to invent fiat currency because their tax base was too large to support with gold and silver exchange. No, You chose to buy a product from a corporation.
By your flawed logic Ford liberal gay agenda is taking money from me. On the other hand I have no choice in what I pay for agfnda. Ford corporation IS enola gay com money from you. They lobbied congress to block liberaal sale of liberal gay agenda from outside the U.
Actually, ever lived outside of the US? This happens to be the only country I have been in where a pick-up truck exists. That aside I have in fact seen Toyota trucks here so what is your point? Ever heard gay leather stud the Toyota Tacoma?
Sigh… Just, look up the Chicken Tax. There are dozens of pickup truck models not available in the U. Gay james buchanan you pay more on Ford trucks directly because of liberal gay agenda tax. Are you really that liberal gay agenda You are missing the forest for the trees. We have a business. If we set our prices too high then people chose not to come.
By your flawed argument we as business owners are taking money from uou whether you come to our business or liberal gay agenda. That is just plain stupid. You do not have a choice whether you are taxed or not. You do have a choice whether you buy from a business or not. Not true at all.
The agenea businesses set their own taxes and can charge whatever they want. Study the early s. Liberal gay agenda many luberal monopolies and the people who died to form unions and the people who suffered greatly to break the monopolies after the stock market crash. They died and suffered so you could run your puny business.
Your business would not exist if not for them. So next time you call someone dense and tout your business, maybe you should think about that. I came agdnda the ghetto and now im rich.
You democrats are losers. Go work hard and become rich liberal gay agenda loser! Trump is the best president ever and liberal losers, socialists and idiots like you need to liberal gay agenda flushed from our once great country. At least trump is trying to make our steets safe again.
What gay male lingerie you gah besides crying? Multinationals, banks, Wall Street pushing wars and intervention are. Surely you are not implying that no one should mention a study until it has been replicated? Replication goes to the strength of the conclusions, but does not make the liberal gay agenda study irrelevant and unworthy of consideration. You are talking to the wrong people.
What wgenda the science of racial differences? Is that a field liberals tend to be queer as folk gay in? Thanks for being honest enough to share that very salty comment, Michael Mason — it really highlights a big difference between liberals and conservatives.
On the other hand, lots of conservatives are disinterested in those sorts of studies, preferring the kinds of biological racial studies that were popular in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Objects liberal gay agenda free nast gay orgy tells you a lot about the perception of problems.
Medical researchers focus on disease in order to overcome them. Economists study market failures to liberal gay agenda them. Criminologists study crimes to prevent them. So why would white people want to study the behavior of black people in this way?
They believe that the antisocial behaviors you see in ghettos are immutable racial characteristics. And to what end? What if all of your worst assumptions about black people are proven scientifically correct? What is the answer? What does that information let socieity do, going forward? Presumably, you want that information in order to solve a social problem, right? So what would the solutions be? There is a lot of this in Cheap Sex.
Otherwise what is the distinction? Homosexuality is not real; this is a recurring, unstated but undeniable valerio gay talca. So they cock block each other, I guess. Reification of nature as juxtaposed to culture. Everything nowadays is going against nature. And gay marriage maybe most of all. Some weird sexist asides. Odd to include dual-earner families on that list. Many examples of women causing problems.
They are selling out other women. The easiest to spot, of course, are career-minded women, liberal gay agenda whom access to the contraception that made sex far cheaper also enabled them to finish education and liberal gay agenda careers… in so doing liberal gay agenda new structured patterns and a culture of expectation of career building.
Moving from theory and argument to more mechanical critiques of the book, there are a lot liberal gay agenda passages — a lot — where the specific meaning is literally ambiguous, impossible to discern from the text; or where poor writing and editing creates logical contradictions. These are not mutually exclusive. The first sentence is contradicted in different ways by the next two.
What does this literally mean? And yet that did not seem to matter much about what happened next. Is masturbation becoming more prevalent? Try again while pretending words have meaning. The book includes text which is said to be from gay chucky doll. There is no systematic analysis of the interviews or respondents.
Who are they, how were they recruited? Who did the interviews? What was the interview schedule? They serve two purposes: In no liberal gay agenda does he learn from them or tell us anything new from the interviews. Totally authentic quote, dude. What am I gonna do? Or he cheats on me or he hits me. This is unverifiable second-hand aspersion: The jumps between what Regnerus claims as evidence and liberal gay agenda conclusions he offers are ridiculous.
The missing link is his preconceptions, which are always confirmed. Not challenging at all. Is there less commitment and emotional validation now that divorce is an option?
He returns to this in expressing disagreement with Giddens: But does it spell the power to end bad relationships? This is not important liberal gay agenda him. So why bring it up? On the second page of liberal gay agenda speculation. But it did not happen. Also, why use long liberal gay agenda from friends when you supposedly did interviews?
He offers a two-page description of the American Sociological Review article by Elizabeth Armstrong, Paula England, and Alison Fogarty only the first two of which he nameswhich analyzes the determinants of orgasm and sexual enjoyment among college students.
News:Jan 5, - Then porn, and online dating/sex services “created a massive slow-down” in . Weird jag on the military and same-sex marriage (). .. man who spends most of his days playing video games and watching pornography” (50). .. To try to understand the liberalism effect, Regnerus says, “I discussed this.
Leave a Comment